Thursday, March 08, 2007

Debate: Is God Necessary for Ethics?

Humanists of Utah
Is God Necessary for Ethics?

Debate !!

The Board was recently approached to cosponsor a debate on the subject
Is God Necessary for Ethics? The other sponsor will be the local
Christ Presbyterian Church.

The principals in the debate will be David Keller, PhD, Associate
Professor of Philosophy at Utah Valley State College and Mark Hausam,
Elder at Christ Presbyterian Church and Adjunct Instructor in
Philosophy at UVSC.

The debate will be held on Friday, April 13, at 7:00 PM in Orson
Spencer Hall on the campus of the University of Utah. The debate will
consist of opening statements, rebuttals, closing statements, and an
open microphone for questions from the audience. The Board considers
this a excellent opportunity to have a public civil discussion of this
often divisive topic.

Please put this on your calendar and come and listen to, and perhaps
participate in, this unique opportunity for humanism to put its best
foot forward in the public arena. We will have literature available
for distribution and would appreciate any help in greeting the public.

Pontiff condemns drive for designer babies, global attacks on right to life

http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=23173

Pontiff condemns drive for designer babies, global attacks on right to life

2/26/2007

VATICAN CITY (Catholic Online) – The drive for designer babies is just
one of the challenges facing the Christian conscience that requires
the mobilization of the Catholic Church to continue its effort to
promote the right to life, said Pope Benedict XVI.

In a Feb. 24 address to the 13th general assembly of the Pontifical
Academy for Life and an international congress on "Christian
conscience in support of the right to life," Pope Benedict stressed
that the right to life "must be supported by everyone because it is
fundamental with respect to other human rights."

Pope Benedict lashed out against developed nations' growing interest
in biotechnological research, "the obsessive search for the 'perfect
child'" through genetic selection, a renewed global push for abortion
rights and same-sex marriage, which is "closed to natural
procreation."

Christians, he said, must speak out against and work toward blunting
continual attacks against the right to life, aware that their
"motivations have deep roots in natural law and can, therefore, be
shared by all people of sound conscience."

Despite the efforts of the church to make "the contents of these
motivations more widely known in the Christian community and the in
civil society," he said "attacks against the right to life in the
world have increased."

He pointed to the "pressures for the legalization of abortion in Latin
American countries and in developing nations," the "liberalization of
new forms of chemical abortion under the pretext of reproductive
health" and the "increase in population-control policies."

The pope decried the "new wave of eugenic discrimination," which has
led many in the "economically develop world" to promote euthanasia "in
the name of the supposed good of the individual."

The Christian conscience, Pope Benedict said, looking to Western
society, must be "illuminated in order to recognize the true value of
actions" and to be able "to distinguish good from evil, even where the
social environment, cultural pluralism and the overlay of interests do
not help to this end."

He told the pontifical academy that the faithful need to continual
formation "in the desire to know the real truth, and in the defense of
their own freedom of choice, against the inclination of the masses and
the flattery of propaganda."

"Open hearts and minds" are key to ensure that the Christian will
"accept the fundamental duties upon which the existence of individuals
and of the community depends," the pope said.

"Only in this way will it be possible to ensure that the young
understand the values of life … of marriage and of family," he said,
and "appreciate the sanctity of love, the joy and responsibility of
parenthood, and of collaborating with God in the giving of life."

When the church's formation is lacking, the pope added, "it becomes
more difficult to pronounce upon the problems associated with
biomedicine in the fields of sexuality, nascent life, procreation, and
upon the way to treat and cure patients and the weaker groups of
society."

He urged scientists, doctors and legislators to contribute to the
effort to strengthen the right to life, "reawakening the clear and
eloquent voice of conscience in many people's hearts."

"When the value of human life is at stake, this harmony between
magisterial function and lay commitment becomes uniquely important,"
he said.

"Life is the primary good we have received from God, the foundation of
all the others," Pope Benedict stated. "Guaranteeing the right to life
– for everyone and in the same way for everyone – is a duty upon which
the future of humanity depends."

In a Feb. 4 remarks delivered before praying the Angelus, Pope
Benedict called for the rejection of abortion and euthanasia and all
attempts to dispose of life under the guise of human mercy.

The pope spoke out for the sanctity of human life "from conception to
natural death" and in defense of the family and traditional marriage
on the Italian Catholic Church's observance of Day of Life and
beginning of the Week of Life and Family.

He called on all gathered at St. Peter's Square and to all the
faithful "to witness to their commitment in favor of life, from
conception to natural death" and "to receive the great and mysterious
gift of life."

The pope linked threats to the unborn through abortion and to those
who are mentally and physically handicapped facing premature
termination of life through euthanasia.

"Life, which is the work of God, must not be denied to any one, not
even the smallest and defenseless newborn, and much less so when he
has serious handicaps," Pope Benedict said.

"I urge you not to fall into the deception of thinking that one can
dispose of life to the point of legitimizing its interruption with
euthanasia, masking it perhaps with a veil of human mercy," he said.

He tied his message on life from womb to tomb to role of the family as
"the cradle of life and of every vocation."

"The family, based on marriage, constitutes the natural environment
for the birth and education of children and, therefore, to ensure the
future of the whole of humanity," he said.

"It is necessary to defend, protect and value it in its unique and
irreplaceable character," Benedict said of the family.

Conservatives launch right-wing version of Wikipedia

http://www.newscientist.com/blog/technology/
A conservative rival for Wikipedia?

Earlier this week I stumbled across something called Conservapedia,
which, at first glance resembles Wikipedia. It is laid out exactly the
same way and uses similar fonts and colours. Furthermore, just like
Wikipedia, anyone can add and edit entries after registering with the
site.

But that's about as far as the similarity goes. On its home page,
Conservapedia claims to be "a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia,
which is increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American". Conservapedia
contains entries that reflect creationist thinking on evolution and
lend support to critics of global warming.

Shortly after I found the site it was also discovered by a group of
anti-Intelligent Design bloggers. They took it upon themselves to poke
fun at the entries and correct much of the science. "Most of the
science on the site is either shallow and useless or downright wrong,"
says Paul Myers, a biologist at the University of Minnesota in Morris
who runs the popular blog Pharyngula.

This flurry of activity lead the site's administrators to change the
edits back and also to ban over 60 IP addresses and users from the
site (compared to just 6 before it was discovered). The reasons given
by the administrators included "obscenity", "vandalism", "violation of
the rules", and ''inappropriate disparagement of God''.

Conservapedia was created by one Andy Schlafly, attorney and son of
the prominent conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly. I contacted him
to ask about removing the posts. "I was very upset," he said. "The
level of vandalism and obscenity was shocking."

Schafly describes the site as "a new way of learning about history
and science". He originally created it together with the 58 students
that he teaches at a home school and he suggests it could ultimately
be used by teachers to as a reference point, because of effort to keep
it clear of "obscenity". But another reason for creating it was what
Schlafly calls the "dissatisfaction and bias" in Wikipedia. "The
administrators are overwhelmingly liberal on Wikipedia," he says.

Joshua Rosenau, a graduate student in evolutionary biology at the
University of Kansas and contributor to Science Blogs claims the site
has a darker side. "On some level it's also reflective of a harmful
attitude that some people – especially those on the far right – tend
to have about science and truth," he told me. "They are re-defining
their own truth and seem to think facts are malleable."

Jimmy Wales, creator of Wikipedia, is more philosophical about the
affair. "Free culture knows no bounds," he told me in an email. "We
welcome the reuse of our work to build variants. That's directly in
line with our mission."

Celeste Biever - technology reporter, New Scientist.

Crypt Held Bodies of Jesus and Family, Film Says

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/27/us/27jesus.html


NY Times, February 27, 2007
Crypt Held Bodies of Jesus and Family, Film Says

By LAURIE GOODSTEIN

A documentary by the Discovery Channel claims to provide evidence that
a crypt unearthed 27 years ago in Jerusalem contained the bones of
Jesus of Nazareth.

Moreover, it asserts that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene, that
the couple had a son, named Judah, and that all three were buried
together.

The claims were met with skepticism by several archaeologists and New
Testament scholars, as well as outrage by some Christian leaders. The
contention that Jesus was married, had a child and left behind his
bones — suggesting he was not bodily resurrected — contradicts core
Christian doctrine.

Two limestone boxes said to contain residue from the remains of Jesus
and Mary Magdalene were unveiled yesterday at a news conference at the
New York Public Library by the documentary's producer, James Cameron,
who made "Titanic" and "The Terminator." His collaborators onstage
included a journalist, a self-taught antiquities investigator, New
Testament scholars, a statistician and an archaeologist. Several of
them said they were excited by the findings but uncertain.

"I would like more information. I remain skeptical," said the
archaeologist, Shimon Gibson, a senior fellow at the W. F. Albright
Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem, in an interview
after the news conference.

In recent years, audiences have demonstrated a voracious appetite for
books, movies and magazines that reassess the life and times of Jesus,
and there is already a book timed to coincide with this documentary,
which will be on the air next Sunday.

"This is exploiting the whole trend that caught on with 'The Da Vinci
Code,' " said Lawrence E. Stager, the Dorot professor of archaeology
of Israel at Harvard, in a telephone interview. "One of the problems
is there are so many biblically illiterate people around the world
that they don't know what is real judicious assessment and what is
what some of us in the field call 'fantastic archaeology.' "

Professor Stager said he had not seen the film but was skeptical.

Mr. Cameron said he had been "trepidatious" about becoming involved in
the project but got engaged out of "great passion for a good detective
story," not to offend and not to cash in.

"I think this is the biggest archaeological story of the century," he
said. "It's absolutely not a publicity stunt. It's part of a very
well-considered plan to reveal this information to the world in a way
that makes sense, with proper documentation."

The documentary, "The Lost Tomb of Jesus," revisits a site discovered
by archaeologists from the Israel Antiquities Authority in the East
Talpiyot neighborhood of Jerusalem in 1980, when the area was being
excavated for a building.

Ten burial boxes, or ossuaries, were found in the tomb, and six of
them had inscriptions. The Discovery Channel filmmakers say, and
archaeologists interviewed concur, there is no possibility the
inscriptions were forged, because they were catalogued at the time by
archaeologists and kept in storage in the Israel Antiquities
Authority.

The documentary's case rests in large part on the interpretation of
the inscriptions, which they say are Jesus, Mary, Mary Magdalene,
Matthew, Joseph and Judah.

In the first century, these names were as common as Tom, Dick and
Harry. But the filmmakers commissioned a statistician, Andrey
Feuerverger, a professor at the University of Toronto, who calculated
that the odds that all six names would appear together in one tomb are
one in 600, calculated conservatively — or as much as one in one
million.

One box is said to be inscribed "Yeshua bar Yosef," in Aramaic, an
ancient dialect of Hebrew that is translated as "Jesus son of Joseph."
The second box is inscribed "Maria," in Hebrew. Maria is the Latin
version of "Miriam" — a name so common in first century ancient Israel
that it was given to about 25 percent of all Jewish women. But the
mother of Jesus has always been known as "Maria" (which in English is
"Mary"). The documentary says that while thousands of ossuaries have
been discovered, only eight have had the inscription "Maria" spelled
phonetically in Hebrew letters.

The third box is labeled "Matia," Hebrew for Matthew, and the
filmmakers cite a reference in the New Testament to buttress their
claim that Mary had many Matthews in her family and it would make
sense to find one in the family tomb.

The fourth box is inscribed "Yose," a nickname for the Hebrew "Yosef,"
or "Joseph" in English. Again, the filmmakers turn to the New
Testament Gospels, which refer to four "brothers" of Jesus: James,
Judah, Simon and Joseph. Scholars disagree whether these were actual
brothers, companions or cousins, but the filmmakers infer that the
inscription refers to a brother of Jesus.

Perhaps the most shaky claims revolve around the inscription on the
fifth box, which the filmmakers assert is that of Mary Magdalene. It
is the only inscription of the six in Greek, and says "Mariamene e
Mara," which the filmmakers say can be translated as "Mary, known as
the master."

The filmmakers cite the interpretation of a Harvard professor,
Fran�ois Bovon, of the "Acts of Phillip," a text from the fourth or
fifth century and recently recovered from a monastery at Mount Athos
in Greece. The filmmakers say that Professor Bovon has determined from
the "Acts of Phillip" that Mariamene is Mary Magdalene's real name.

The filmmakers commissioned DNA testing on the residue in the boxes
said to have held Jesus and Mary Magdalene. There are no bones left,
because the religious custom in Israel is to bury archeological
remains in a cemetery.

However, the documentary's director and its driving force, Simcha
Jacobovici, an Israeli-born Canadian, said there was enough
mitochondrial DNA for a laboratory in Ontario to conclude that the
bodies in the "Jesus" and "Mary Magdalene" ossuaries were not related
on their mothers' side. From this, Mr. Jacobovici deduced that they
were a couple, because otherwise they would not have been buried
together in a family tomb.

In an interview, Mr. Jacobovici was asked why the filmmakers did not
conduct DNA testing on the other ossuaries to determine whether the
one inscribed "Judah, son of Jesus" was genetically related to either
the Jesus or Mary Magdalene boxes; or whether the Jesus remains were
actually the offspring of Mary.

"We're not scientists. At the end of the day we can't wait till every
ossuary is tested for DNA," he said. "We took the story that far. At
some point you have to say, 'I've done my job as a journalist.' "

Among the most influential scholars to dispute the documentary was
Amos Kloner, former Jerusalem district archaeologist of the Israel
Antiquities Authority, who examined the tomb in 1980.

Mr. Kloner said in a telephone interview that the inscription on the
alleged "Jesus" ossuary is not clear enough to ascertain. The box on
display at the news conference is a plain rectangle with rough gashes
on one side. The one supposedly containing Mary Magdalene has
six-petalled rosettes and an elaborate border.

"The new evidence is not serious, and I do not accept that it is
connected to the family of Jesus," said Mr. Kloner, who appears in the
documentary as a skeptic.

New Testament scholars also criticized the documentary as
theologically dangerous, historically inaccurate and irresponsible.

"A lot of conservative, orthodox and moderate Christians are going to
be upset by the recklessness of this," said Ben Witherington, a Bible
scholar at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Ky. "Of course, we
want to know more about Jesus, but please don't insult our
intelligence by giving us this sort of stuff. It's going to get a lot
of Christians with their knickers in a knot unnecessarily."

Isabel Kershner contributed reporting from Jerusalem.

Journal of Mormon History: Fall 2006 (Vol. 32, No. 3)

Journal of Mormon History
Fall 2006 (Vol. 32, No. 3)
LAVINA FIELDING ANDERSON, EDITOR
Paperback. 276 Pages / 0094-7342 / $15.00.

The current issue contains "Bickertonites: Schism and Reunion in
Restoration Church, 1880-1905 " (Gary R. Entz);


"Mountain Meadows Survivor? A Mitochondrial DNA Exmanination " (Ugo A.
Perego and Scott R. Woodward);


"Rhetoric and Ritual: A Decade of Woman's Exponent Death Poetry"
(Kylie Nielson Turley );


"'The Queen of Inventions': The Sewing Machine Comes to Utah " (Audrey
M. Godfrey);


"Mormonims and Guerrillas in Bolivia" (David Clark Knowlton ).

Significant Dates in Biblical History

http://www.aarweb.org/syllabus/syllabi/r/rennie/rel151/dates.htm
>From the course "UNDERSTANDING THE BIBLE" by Dr. Bryan Rennie:

Significant Dates in Biblical History

(CE indicates the Christian era and BCE before the Christian era.)

13th C. BCE Exodus from Egypt. THE EXODUS.

1250-1200 BCE Gradual conquest of Palestine. ENTRY INTO THE PROMISED LAND.

1020-922 BCE Kingdom of Israel united under Saul (crowned 1020),
David, and Solomon. THE KINGDOM OF ISRAEL.

959-952 BCE Building of the Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem. THE TEMPLE.

922 BCE Death of Solomon and division into the northern Kingdom
(Israel)and the southern Kingdom (Judah).

Earliest possible period of the consolidation of the Yahwistic and
Elohistic traditions (J & E). They were combined after composition of
the Deuteronomic tradition (D).

737 BCE Assyrians invade Israel.

722 BCE Destruction and exile of Israel by Sargon II of Assyria. THE
"TEN LOST TRIBES".

701?688 BCE Assyrians under Sennacherib invade Kingdom of Judah.

Earliest possible period of consolidation of Deuteronomic tradition (D).

627 BCE Death of Emperor Asshurbanapal and slow collapse of Assyria.

622 BCE Finding of the Book of the Law (2 Kings 22:8; 2Chr 34:14)

612 BCE Babylonians and Medes destroy Nineveh, capitol of Assyria.

597 BCE First deportation into exile in Babylon of leaders of Judah.

587/6 BCE Destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple and second deportation.

582 BCE Third and final deportation. THE EXILE.

Earliest possible period of consolidation of the Priestly tradition (P).

539 BCE The Persians under Cyrus the Great conquer Babylonian Empire.

538 BCE Cyrus issues edict allowing the repatriation of the exiles. He
pursues a policy of local identity and self-rule.

THE POST EXILIC PERIOD.

520 - 515 The Jerusalem Temple is rebuilt with the encouragement of
the prophets Haggai and Zechariah and the assistance of Persia.

494 & 480 The Greeks defeat the Persians at the battles of Marathon
and Salamis but the Persians keep Asia Minor.

445 BCE Nehemiah, cupbearer to Artaxerxes the Persian emperor, is
appointed governor of Judah. He further rebuilds Jerusalem, and
enforces Ezra's ban on inter-marriage.

428 BCE (possibly 458 or even 398) The Persians appoint Ezra "scribe
of the law of the god of heaven" (Ezra 7:12) to assist in the Jewish
restoration. Ezra re-establishes the Laws of Moses (Torah?
Deuteronomy? "Holiness code" of Leviticus 17-26)

Earliest possible period of canonization of the Hebrew Torah (=Pentateuch).

350 BCE Philip II of Macedon unites Greece and Macedonia and plans the
invasion of Asia Minor.

336 BCE Philip is assassinated and Alexander inherits the empire.

334 BCE Alexander crosses the Rubicon and extends the Greek empire.

333 & 2 BCE Alexander conquers Israel and extends the Greek Empire to
Egypt and Persia. THE GREEK PERIOD.

323 BCE Alexander dies of fever on the way back to Macedonia.

313 BCE Alexander's generals Seleucus and Ptolemy secure their rule of
Babylon and Egypt respectively. The Ptolemies rule Palestine.

Earliest possible period of completion of Hebrew Nevi'im (The Prophets).

250 BCE Beginning of the translation of the Hebrew scriptures into
Greek - the Septuagint.

200 BCE Seleucids take Palestine from the Ptolemies with the
assistance of the pro-Greek Jewish aristocracy.

190 BCE The Romans defeat Antiochus III, the Seleucid emperor, at
Magnesia and bring the Seleucids into crisis.

175 BCE Antiochus IV (Epiphanes) succeeds to the Seleucid throne.

167 BCE Antiochus Epiphanes profanes the Temple by introducing the
cult of Zeus and offering sacrifices including pigs. This provokes the
Maccabean revolt.

164 BCE The Maccabean revolt temporarily regains independence and
rededicates the Temple to the worship of Yahweh. This is celebrated in
the Feast of Hanukkah.

Earliest possible period of completion of Hebrew Ketuvim (The Writings).

THE ROMAN PERIOD.

67 BCE The Romans take Antioch, Damascus, and Jerusalem.

63 BCE The Roman empire inherits all of Palestine and all its problems
from the Greek Empire.

c. 0-30 CE The life of Jesus of Nazareth.

70 CE The Romans destroy the Temple after a revolt and the Diaspora
begins in ernest.

Earliest possible period of the complete canonization of the Hebrew Bible.

135 CE After the Bar-Kochba revolt the Romans prohibit Jews from Judea.

313 CE Christianity receives Roman Imperial support.

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Online Parallel Bible


Here is a rather remarkable tool for biblical study - The Online Parallel Bible.

http://bible.cc/genesis/1-1.htm

It has a nice online comparison of nine translations of the Bible, plus Hebrew, a Hebrew lexicon, multiple modern languages, concordance, dictionary multiple commentaries and more. These tools can be focused on a single verse or chapter and viewed through two panes in a split window format. Each pane can easily switched between the categories mentioned above.

This is a very creative tools bringing together multiple resources into a usable tool.


Radical Mormon Feminist Manifesto



Last week the blog Exponent II published a working document called the Radical Mormon Feminist Manifesto ( http://exponentblog.blogspot.com/2007/02/our-radical-mormon-feminist-manifesto.html ) After some discussion, the author call for working towards the following goals:

1) Call couples to serve in bishoprics together. Allow women to interview and hear the confessions of other women.
2) Jettison boy scouts and create the same youth programs for girls and boys.
3) Drop the "preside" language about marriage. Focus on co-equal partnerships.
4) Make priesthood ordinations optional and/or given as a young person desires it--sort of like a patriarchal blessing. Allow both girls and boys the same opportunities for ordination.
5) Let women learn their husbands' new names at the temple veil.
6) Allow same-sex couples to be sealed in the temple, even when local laws don't allow legal marriage.
7) Let women plan and speak at their own RS Conferences w/no men involved.
8) Allow women to preside over official meetings, such as sacrament meeting
9) Turn the focus from bishops making the callings to self-callings - let both men and women volunteer and seek out roles they are interested in (even if men want to be in primary or women want to be in leadership)
Now, apparently, "LDS Women Blogs" has removed "Exponent II" from their list of blogs for LDS women for violating their primary rule to "not be critical of Church leaders" ( http://ldswomenblogs.blogspot.com/2007/02/exponent-ii-radical-mormon-feminist.html) ,

19th century Mormon feminism was strong and a vital part of the church. However this changed in the 20th century. Feminism in the church has taken on a negative connotation, particularly as the church reacted against the feminist movement and against the Equal Rights Amendment in the 70s. However it seems that the church has softened it's stance in some areas regarding the subordinate role of women. Examples include allowing women to pray in sacrament meeting, changes to the temple ceremony that put less emphasis on women's subordinate role, and rhetoric from President Hinckley and other general authorities illustrating hat even though men preside over women, they are co-equal partners.

The disconnect between the church's gender roles and the American ideal of equality for the sexes will keep the discussion going.

Chimps observing making & using weapons


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/22/AR2007022201007.html

Chimps Observed Making Their Own Weapons

By Rick Weiss
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 22, 2007; 2:48 PM

Chimpanzees living in the West African savannah have been observed
fashioning deadly spears from sticks and using the hand-crafted tools
to hunt small mammals -- the first routine production of deadly
weapons ever observed in animals other than humans.

The multi-step spear-making practice, documented by researchers in
Senegal who spent years gaining the chimpanzees' trust, adds credence
to the idea that human forebears fashioned similar tools millions of
years ago.

The landmark observation also supports the long-debated proposition
that females -- the main makers and users of spears among the
Senegalese chimps -- tend to be the innovators and creative problem
solvers in primate culture.

Using their hands and teeth, the chimpanzees were repeatedly seen
tearing the side branches off long straight sticks, peeling back the
bark and sharpening one end, the researchers report in today's on-line
issue of the journal Current Biology. Then, grasping the weapon in a
"power grip," they jabbed into tree-branch hollows where bush babies
-- small monkey-like mammals -- sleep during the day.

After stabbing their prey repeatedly, they removed the injured or dead
animal and ate it.

"It was really alarming how forceful it was," said lead researcher
Jill D. Pruetz of Iowa State University in Ames, adding that it
reminded her of the murderous shower scene in the Alfred Hitchcock
movie "Psycho." "It was kind of scary."

The new observations are "stunning," said Craig Stanford, a
primatologist and professor of anthropology at the University of
Southern California. "Really fashioning a weapon to get food -- I'd
say that's a first for any non-human animal."

Scientists have documented tool use among chimpanzees for several
decades, but the tools have been simple and used to extract food
rather than to kill it.

Some chimpanzees slide thin sticks or leaf blades into termite mounds,
for example, to fish for the tasty, crawling morsels. Others crumple
leaves and use them like sponges to sop drinking water from tree
hollows.

But while a few chimpanzees have been observed throwing rocks --
perhaps with the goal of knocking prey unconscious, but perhaps simply
as expressions of excitement -- and a few others have been known to
swing simple clubs, only people have been known to craft tools
expressly to hunt prey.

Pruetz and coworker Paco Bertolani of the University of Cambridge made
the observations near Kedougou in southeastern Senegal. Unlike other
chimpanzee sites currently under study, which are forested, this site
is mostly open savannah. That environment is very much like the one in
which early humans evolved and is different enough from other sites to
expect differences in chimpanzee behaviors.

Pruetz recalled the first time she saw a member of the 35-member troop
trimming leaves and side-branches off a branch it had broken off a
tree.

"I just knew right away that she was making a tool," Pruetz said,
adding that she suspected -- with some horror -- what it was for, as
well. But in that instance she was not able to follow the chimpanzee
to see what she did with it.

Eventually the research duo documented 22 instances of spear-making
and use, two-thirds of them involving females.

In a typical sequence, the animal first discovered a deep hollow
suitable for bush babies, which are nocturnal and weigh about half a
pound. Then the chimp would break off a nearby branch -- on average
about two feet long, but up to twice that length -- trim it, sharpen
it with its teeth, and poke it repeatedly into the hollow at a rate of
about one or two jabs per second.

After every few jabs, the chimpanzee would sniff or lick the tip, as
though testing to see if it had "caught" anything.

In only one of 22 observations did a chimp get a bush baby. But that
is reasonably efficient, Pruetz said, compared to standard chimpanzee
hunting practice, which involves chasing a monkey or other prey,
grabbing it by the tail and then slamming its head against the ground.

In the successful bush baby case, the chimpanzee eventually jumped on
the larger branch until it broke, exposing the limp bushbaby, which
the chimp then extracted. Whether the animal was dead or alive at that
point was unclear, but it did not move or make any sound.

Chimpanzee behavior is widely believed to offer a window on early
human behavior, and many researchers have hoped that the animals --
which are humans' closest genetic cousins -- might reveal something
about the earliest use of wooden tools.

Many suspect that wooden tools far predate the use of stone tools --
remnants of which have been found going back two-and-a-half million
years. But because wood does not preserve well, the most ancient
wooden spears ever found are only about 400,000 years old, leaving
open the question of when they first came into use.

The discovery that some chimps today make wooden weapons supports the
idea that early humans did too -- perhaps as much as 5 million years
ago -- Stanford said.

Adrienne Zihlman, an anthropologist at the University of California at
Santa Cruz, said the work supports other evidence that female chimps
are more likely to use tools than males, are more proficient tool
users, and are crucial to passing that cultural knowledge to others.

"Females are the teachers," Zihlman said, noting that juvenile chimps
in Senegal were repeatedly seen watching their mothers make and hunt
with spears.

"They are efficient and innovative, they are problem solvers, they are
curious," Zihlman said of females. And that makes sense, she said.

"They are pregnant or lactating or carrying a kid for most of their
life," she said. "And they're supposed to be running around in the
trees chasing prey?"

Frans B. M. de Waal, a primatologist at Emory University, said
aggressive tool use is but the latest "uniquely human" behavior to be
found to be less than unique.

"Such claims are getting old," he said. "With the present pace of
discovery, they last a few decades at most."

Post a Comment

The European Mormon Studies Association Conference


EMSA Summer Conference: Call For Papers

The European Mormon Studies Association (EMSA)

Inaugural Conference

University of Worcester, England

2-4 August 2007

Keynote address: Armand L. Mauss, Professor of Sociology and Religious
Studies Emeritus, Washington State University; Former Editor, Journal
for the Scientific Study of Religion

Call for Papers

"Periphery and Centre: European Mormons and their Relationship with
North America, 1837-2007″

While scholars have historically emphasised the experience of
Mormonism within the United States, there is a rich legacy of
Mormonism within Europe, beginning with the arrival of the first
Mormon missionaries one hundred and seventy years ago in 1837.
European Mormons in this Mormon periphery have had a changing
relationship with the American centre, from the 19th century when
emigration to the centre was encouraged, to the 20th century when
emigration was no longer church policy. What are the stories of those
19th century Mormons who stayed behind? How have European Mormons
viewed the United States through the years? What is the current
relationship between Mormonism in Europe and its American centre?

Papers are invited that represent a wide range of research topics
relating to the experience of Mormonism within Europe. We are happy to
welcome scholarly papers that come from different fields of study:
historical, theological, literary, sociological, anthropological, and
political.

Please send an abstract to David Morris by 15 April 2007. It is
expected that final papers will be approximately 3,500�C4,000 words,
being delivered in a time of 20-30 minutes each. A question and answer
session will be available following each paper. Notification of
acceptance will be given by 1 May 2007. Session chairs may request a
draft paper in order to offer a response. It is anticipated that
conference proceedings will be published.

Conference attendees will be charged 15 GBP (10 GBP students), with a
five pounds reduction available to those who register in advance
(details to follow).

Worcester is a beautiful cathedral town in the heart of England, 10
miles away from the Malvern Hills and the Mormon historical sites of
Benbow's Farm and the newly-restored Gadfield Elm chapel. A history
tour will be offered as part of the conference. Details on transport
to Worcester and accommodation in the city are available at the
Worcester tourist information centre.

FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
David M. Morris, University of Chichester
Conference Coordinator, European Mormon Studies Association
Ph: +44 (0)790 337 4685 Fax: +44 (0)870 132 8807
Email: davidmmorris at euromormonstudies dot com

BYU Blocks You Tube


http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/210588/

BYU blocks campus access to YouTube
KATE MCNEIL - Daily Herald

It was the catch heard 'round the county.

With time expired, Brigham Young University quarterback John Beck
chucked the pigskin across his body to connect with a wide-open Jonny
Harline in the end zone, sealing a 33-31 victory against rival
University of Utah.

Minutes later, as jubilant Cougar fans drove home, videos of the final
play were being uploaded on YouTube.

A moment burned in the brains of BYU faithful is immortalized, at
least 15 times, on the ever-popular video sharing site. The only
catch? Even John Beck himself can't access the videos on campus.

YouTube is one of the newest sites to be blocked from BYU's on-campus
computers. It's self-explanatory that the school blocks sites like
Frederick's of Hollywood and the Wonderful World of Lesbianism -- but
why restrict access to every 20-something's favorite pastime?

"We use the filtering process for two reasons," said BYU spokeswoman
Carri Jenkins. "First to protect students from inappropriate material.
The other is because of our limited bandwidth. That bandwidth is used
for academic purposes."


BYU's filtering software, Secure Computing, filters three main things
-- pornography, adult content and violence, Jenkins said. BYU's
information technology department decided to block YouTube, despite
the site's own pornography filters, early fall semester 2006.

Google video is allowed, Jenkins said, because searches are conducted
through keywords. Secure Computing can easily filter out keywords like
sex, porn and violence on Google video better than it can on YouTube.
YouTube uses tags for its videos. In the BYU vs. Utah videos, tags
such as "BYU," "football," "answered," and "prayer" are used to find
Beck's heroic play.

"Inappropriate material can't be filtered on YouTube," Jenkins said.

Furthermore, Jenkins stressed that BYU is an academic institution and
its on-campus bandwidth should be used for academic purposes.

Internet access in on-campus residences like Wyview Terrace, where
Megan Timothy lives, is restricted in the same way as computers in the
Harold B. Lee Library. Timothy said she finds humor in most YouTube
videos and wishes she could access it at home, but understands the
block on campus.

"It's BYU and they block everything," she said.

Tyler Seibold's "beef" with the block is that he can't listen to new
music on campus. But, it's "not a huge deal," he said. The off-campus
accounting student can access the Tube all he wants through a private
Internet provider in his apartment.

In the campus newspaper, the Daily Universe, Todd Lagerberg said he
"saw much more nudity in the MTC showers than (he has) ever seen on
the BYU Internet."

Lagerberg, who also lives in Wyview, wishes BYU would "trust their
students more."

"There's really no way to get around it, I'm either at school or at
home," he said. "Both places I can't access it. If they're really
worried about the bandwidth usage, they should block MySpace too. On
MySpace you can find profiles that are pretty close to pornographic
but there's no blocks on that."

The university's IT department has the ability to monitor individual
students' Internet usage, but only do so if a concern is presented
about that particular student.

Jenkins said pornography access on campus is "not a huge problem,
given that our students are understanding of our campus environment."

"Everyone knows the Internet is full of garbage," said Adam Anderson,
a master's student in public management. "If you're going to block one
site, it's just a drop in the bucket."

Kate McNeil can be reached at 344-2549 or kmcneil@heraldextra.com.
This story appeared in The Daily Herald on page A1.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Mormon missionaries released by Nigerian kidnappers

http://www.sltrib.com/ci_5275638
The Salt Lake Tribune

Posted: 6:50 PM- SALT LAKE CITY - Four Mormon missionaries abducted
from their apartment Saturday morning in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, were
released unharmed at 10:40 p.m. (2:40 p.m. MST) Wednesday to the home
of LDS Church Bishop Sancho N. Chukwu, who helped negotiate their
release, church officials said.
The motive behind the hostage takings was not fully known, said
Quentin L. Cook, of the First Quorum of Seventy and executive director
of the LDS Church's missionary department. However, the captors likely
believed they had abducted oil company workers, for whom they would
receive ransom payments, then quickly realized they had made a
mistake.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, sticking to
policy, paid no ransom for the missionaries' release, said LDS Apostle
M. Russell Ballard, chairman of the missionary executive committee.
However, it did give the captors $810 to pay for the four men's food,
lodging and care during their captivity.
Church officials said they paid the money early on in negotiations
with the captors to ensure the men, all Nigerians age 20 to 25, were
properly cared for. They credited church leaders in Nigeria and
involvement of other community members, including tribal chiefs, in
helping to resolve the matter. And they expressed their gratitude for
worldwide prayers.
Officials could not comment on the captors, the details of the
abduction nor the conditions in which the missionaries were kept. But
they did say the missionaries were in good health and doing fine.
"Their spirits are high and they are expected to return shortly to
the work they love," Bruce Olsen, spokesman for the LDS Church, said
while reading from a prepared statement.
Cook fought back tears as he spoke about the "wonderful young
people" who serve the church and the sacrifices they make.
Speculating on what the missionaries might have been doing during
their time with the captors, Ballard said, "I think they were teaching
the lessons.. . . Hearts were softened."
The Port Harcourt Mission will continue operations, even amid
escalating violence in the oil-rich Niger Delta region. The LDS Church
will take precautions, as necessary, just as they did last month when
they moved five American missionary couples to safer ground in the
west African country. This decision was made in response to a U.S.
State Department travel warning and because it was the Americans who
were most likely to be mistaken for oil company workers, who've been
the targets of more than 70 hostage takings since the start of the
year.
Of the 352 young missionaries serving in Nigeria, none are
American and most are African, officials said.
Moving missionaries around, in response to security concerns, is
nothing new for the church. They've made changes in missionary plans
due to conflicts in Peru, Colombia and Ecuador, to name a few. So
officials don't expect tensions in Nigeria to hamper the church's
work.
Mormon missionaries first arrived in Nigeria in 1978. Today, there
are more than 74,000 Latter-day Saints living in the country.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Southern Baptist Convention warns Christians about teachings of Mormonism


Southern Baptist Convention warns Christians about teachings of Mormonism


By Allie Martin

Rob Bowman with the North American Mission Board of the Southern
Baptist Convention (SBC) says Christians need to be aware that the
beliefs of the Mormon Church are inconsistent with biblical
Christianity. As one Mormon candidate launches his White House bid,
the Southern Baptist official is urging Christians to take advantage
of materials his denomination offers that teach the truth about
Mormonism.

The article continues here: http://www.spcm.org/Journal/spip.php?article6558

Darwin vs God in Kansas


The same ol' science vs. religion dispute erupts again in the same
state that had previously ruled teachers should become
"downgraded-preachers" and that scientific evidence for the
evolutionist theory is too scarce.

The State Board of Education approved new, evolution-friendly science
standards with a 6-4 vote Tuesday, replacing ones that questioned the
theory and had the support of "intelligent design" advocates.

The shift towards the evolution-friendly approach in Kansas schools is
not the result of some scientific breakthrough, it's merely the
outcome of the elections that took place last year for the State Board
of Education. A coalition of moderate Republicans and Democrats
decided it's time to favor Darwin again instead of God, making this
the fifth change in standards for Kansas schools in less than 8 years.

Conservative Republicans, who had recommended in 2005 that students
should receive their tuition inside the "intelligent-design" frame,
said after Tuesday's vote they weren't planning to reopen the debate
even if elections go their way in 2008. But the state law will require
another review of school standards by 2014.

In the mean time, Darwin's newly acquired advantage against God is not
that certain, with another change possible in the next few years in
the Board.

"I think we're good for two years," said board member Janet Waugh, a
Kansas City Democrat who supported the new standards. "Who knows what
the election will hold in two years?"

The Board recommended the deletion of paragraphs that dealt with the
evolution vs. creation problem, and allowed school manuals to include
key-terms from evolution-theory that refer to the common origin of
life on Earth and random mutations that lead to the appearance of new
species. The new standards are said to reflect mainstream scientific
views of evolution.

"There seems to be a pattern," said board member Steve Abrams.
"Anything that might question the veracity of evolution is deleted."

The political decision followed a day after the 198th anniversary of
Darwin's birth, which the University of Kansas celebrated with a
costume party and an evolution theory-biased documentary called "Flock
of Dodos."

The Board also revised the definition of the word "science",
describing it only as the search for natural explanations of what's
observed in the universe.

Some scientists and science groups believed the board's latest action
was significant because it turned back a subtle attack on evolution
that encouraged schools to teach about an evolution "controversy,"
rather than mandating that creationism or intelligent design be
taught. Intelligent design says an intelligent cause is the best way
to explain some complex and orderly features of the universe.

Opponents of the new standards, grouped in Intelligent Design Network,
rallied against the Board's ruling, claiming almost 4,000 signatures
were gathered from adherents of "intelligent-design".

Convincing those people about science' merits will be difficult, said
Jack Krebs, a former maths teacher who is president of Kansas Citizens
for Science.

"The bigger issue is the cultural divide. The intelligent design
people and the anti-evolution people truly believe that science as it
is practiced is atheistic, and excludes God, and this is really the
heart of the cultural battle," Mr Krebs said.

John Calvert, a retired attorney who helped found the group, accused
the board of promoting atheism. And Greg Lassey, a retired
Wichita-area biology teacher, said the new standards undermine
families by "discrediting parents who reject materialism and the
ethics and morals it fosters."

The new standards are important because they are the basis upon which
the state builds tests that involve science and how well students are
learning it. The schools' autonomy leaves any decision about how
students are being taught science to the teachers and local school
boards, but since tests are Darwin-inclined, members of the two
parties agree that teachers will most certainly choose the alternative
that offers their students the best chances for high scores.

Similar debates or legal battles over evolution took place in
California, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Ohio, Nevada and South
Carolina. In Kansas, the hearings from 2005 drew journalists from
Canada, France, Great Britain and Japan.

In the last five years, anti-evolution legislation has been introduced
in 24 state legislatures and similar policies were under consideration
in at least 20 states, according to the National Centre for Science
Education in California.

Glenn Branch, deputy director of the National Centre for Science
Education said "They have really been on a rollercoaster for the last
10 years in Kansas. This isn't really good for the state of science
education in Kansas for the treatment of evolution to be in such flux.
It probably does have the effect of encouraging creationism in the
local classroom."

Romney announces bid for presidency


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/13/opinion/polls/printable2469572.shtml

Poll: Romney's Mormonism May Be An Issue
NEW YORK, Feb. 13, 2007(CBS) Republican Mitt Romney, a Mormon who
announced his candidacy for president on Tuesday, may face an obstacle
because of his religion, according to a CBS News poll.

A majority of Americans say they would vote for a qualified Mormon
from either party for president, but fewer have favorable views of the
Mormon religion than of many other faiths.

The poll asked Americans whether they would support a Mormon candidate
for president, without mentioning Romney's name. Sixty-three percent
said they would vote for a qualified Republican who was Mormon, and 66
percent said they'd back a qualified Democrat who was Mormon. But
about one in four people said they would not vote for a Mormon
candidate for president.


VOTE FOR A QUALIFIED MORMAN CANDIDATE IF HE/SHE WERE… (Among registered voters)

A REPUBLICAN:
Yes
63%
No
27%

A DEMOCRAT:
Yes
66%
No
24%

The percentage of Americans who said they would vote for a Mormon for
president was smaller than the number who said they'd vote for either
a woman or a black candidate in a CBS News poll conducted last month.

In that poll, more than eight in 10 voters said they'd support a
qualified black candidate of either party. Seventy-seven percent said
they'd vote for a woman if she were a Republican, while 82 percent
would back her if she were a Democrat.

Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, remains unknown to the vast
majority of Americans, including eight in 10 Republicans, according to
the poll, which was conducted before he made his announcement.

Romney is not the first presidential candidate whose religion is an
issue to some voters. When John F. Kennedy ran for president in 1960
there were concerns about his being a Catholic. But in a May 1960
Gallup Poll, 71 percent of Americans said they would support a
well-qualified Catholic candidate for president.

Americans have a less favorable view of the Mormon religion than most
other faiths. Protestantism, Catholicism, Judaism, and Christian
fundamentalism were all seen more positively than Mormonism in the
poll. Only Islam, of all the religions asked about, ranked lower.

Twenty-five percent of Americans said they have a favorable impression
of the Mormon religion, while three in 10 have an unfavorable
impression. Another 39 percent haven't heard enough about the religion
to say.

Other religions are viewed more favorably: Protestantism (61%),
Catholicism (51%), Judaism (48%), and Christian fundamentalist
religions (35%).


WHAT IS YOUR IMPRESSION OF…?

Protestantism/other Christians:
Favorable
61%
Unfavorable
13%
Haven't heard enough
23%

The Catholic religion:
Favorable
51%
Unfavorable
30%
Haven't heard enough
17%

Philip Barlow to Fill Mormon Studies Position


http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_5216425

USU prof breaks new ground in the study of Mormonism
By Peggy Fletcher Stack
The Salt Lake Tribune

Philip Barlow, a Harvard-trained professor of theology and American
religious history, has been named the country's first full-time
professor of Mormon studies at a secular university.

After a nationwide search, Utah State University chose Barlow for
the Leonard J. Arrington Chair of Mormon History and Culture, a
significant addition to the school's burgeoning department of
religious studies.

Though a Utah native, Barlow has not lived in the state for
decades. After graduating from Weber State College, he earned graduate
degrees from Harvard in religion and American culture and the history
of Christianity. For more than a decade, he has taught an introductory
course in theology and suffering as well as upper-level courses in
Christian history, American religion, and theological explorations of
time, silence, and film at Hanover College in Indiana.

As a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,
Barlow intended his graduate studies to focus on everything but
Mormonism. His Harvard professors were intrigued, however, and he
ended up exploring the place of the LDS Church in American religion
for his dissertation. Since then, he has worked on a historical atlas
of American religion and a look at religion and public life in the
Midwest. He is currently the president of the Mormon History
Association.

"I was something of a curiosity and a sensation when I first
arrived at Hanover, which has Presbyterian roots," Barlow said in a
phone interview. "I've been operating within theological studies,
which I construe as a rigorous examination of theology. We see
ourselves as thinking critically within a Christian context which has
been broad enough to include me."

At USU, Barlow will not be discussing or promoting his faith.

"We are not teaching Mormon doctrine or theology . . . or testing
the truth of it," said Norman L. Jones, history department chairman.
"We are looking at what people do because they believe certain
things."

USU's religious studies program, the first of its kind in the
Intermountain West, looks at religion from three different angles:
cultural, historical and artistic; social scientific aspects of
anthropology, sociology and psychology; and philosophical.

About a dozen students enrolled in the program last fall, and the
first one will graduate this spring, having completed all the
requirements by putting together classes from several departments,
Jones said.

Barlow joins Charles Prebish, an internationally known expert on
Buddhism, who was hired last year as the Charles Redd Chair of
Religious Studies. Eventually, the school hopes to add a chair on
Islam and another one on Judaism.

"One of the things we believe strongly is that this is not just
about the local situation; it's a global conversation," Jones said.
"How on earth do you have peace in the world that's so religiously
divided?

If the university doesn't step up and help students think about
religion in the context of its practice, we've got a problem."

Barlow is optimistic about his new assignment.

"I hope to erode boundaries of all sorts with this study," he
said. "I want to make USU a welcoming place for not only the outside
world to recognize Mormonism as an important topic and for Latter-day
Saints themselves to find a safe place where all questions are
in-bounds."

Meanwhile, the Claremont Graduate University School of Religion in
Southern California is also soliciting qualified applicants to fill
the newly created Howard W. Hunter Chair in Mormon Studies. The school
hopes to review applications later this month.

pstack@sltrib.com

Philip Barlow

* Position: Utah State University's new Leonard J. Arrington Chair of
Mormon History and Culture

* Education: Bachelor of arts Weber State College, master of
theological studies and doctor of theology, Harvard University

* Previous position: Professor of theological studies, Hanover College

Harry Reid's son goes with Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign

Harry Reid's son goes with Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign

ASSOCIATED PRESS
6:23 p.m. February 18, 2007
WASHINGTON – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has not endorsed a Democratic presidential candidate, but his son has.

Rory Reid is signing on as Nevada chairman for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential bid. He will be senior adviser on Western issues including public lands, transportation, resources and conservation, growth and affordable housing, the New York senator's campaign said in a statement Sunday.

Reid, 44, is chairman of the Clark County, Nev., Commission and a former chairman of the Nevada State Democratic Party.

The announcement prompted his father to release a statement noting he is still neutral.

"Rory is a 44-year-old man who makes his own decisions and I respect him for that, but let me be very clear: Rory's work with Sen. Clinton should in no way be taken as an endorsement by me," the senator said in a statement.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Belief-o-Matic

Here is a fun personality quiz that categorizes what religion you seem
to belong to (thanks Lorin). Strangely, it determines that I am a
neo-pagan.
---

Belief-O-Matic -- A personality quiz about your religious and spiritual beliefs

Even if YOU don't know what faith you are, Belief-O-Matic™ knows.
Answer 20 questions about your concept of God, the afterlife, human
nature, and more, and Belief-O-Matic™ will tell you what religion (if
any) you practice...or ought to consider practicing.

Warning: Belief-O-Matic™ assumes no legal liability for the ultimate
fate of your soul.

http://www.beliefnet.com/story/76/story_7665_1.html?WT.mc_id=NL44

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Women's Rights in Old Testament Times

The full text of "Women's Rights in Old Testament Times" is now
online. Here is a description from the publishers website:
---
Women's Rights in Old Testament Times
JAMES R. BAKER

Old Testament women were often as tough-minded and strong-willed as
their male counterparts, and many were able to work the religious and
secular law to their advantage. Baker unravels the labyrinth of
Aramean, Assyrian, Babylonian, Canaanite, Egyptian, Hittite, Sumerian,
and Hebrew culture and interprets arcane biblical narratives in light
of legal custom. He considers women in business; surrogate sexual
partners and slave-husband counterparts to men's slaves and
concubines; inheritance rights of daughters; and metronomic marriage,
in which the wife provided land, occupation, and family for a less
well-situated husband. He makes many of the Old Testament stories
understandable for the first time and renders several object lessons
taught in Sunday School obsolete, though he also bolsters others and
provides grist for further discussion.

---
James R. Baker is a Salt Lake City attorney and free-lance writer who
has studied at Brigham Young University, York University, and Hebrew
University.

The full text is available here:
http://www.signaturebookslibrary.org/old/intro.htm

Call for Proposals, 2007 Salt Lake Sunstone Symposium

http://sunstoneblog.com/?p=196

Call for Proposals, 2007 Salt Lake Sunstone Symposium, 8-11 August, Sheraton, Salt Lake City

Proposal deadline is 1 May 2007.

This year's special focus is "The Public Faces of Mormonism." With Mitt Romney poised for a presidential campaign, with Harry Reid as the senate majority leader, with the four-hour Helen Whitney documentary on Mormonism past and present about to be debut on PBS in late-April and early May, with the formation of Mormon studies chairs at two major universities, with the rise of LDS blogging, with Benji winning this past season's So You Think You Can Dance? and Ken Jennings still parlaying his record-breaking Jeopardy! run into a continued national profile, it seems Mormonism is and will continue to be in 2007's national spotlight as bright perhaps as it was during the build-up to the 2002 Salt Lake Winter Olympics.


Given this profile, we felt it would be fun to explore today's public faces in terms of individuals as well as emerging trends and movements.